Take for example, the issue of the desirability or
failure of “the bail-out”, much decried by conservative economists, who
strongly prefer deficit reduction and an austerity regimen as the economic cure. It so happens, that when the global financial
crisis hit Europe at the same time as America back in 2008, European bankers,
particularly the Germans, prescribed just that. Both the EU and America
suffered immediate sharp economic declines.
In Europe the prescribed austerity produced in addition great social
trauma, including a “humanitarian crisis” and rioting first in Greece, and now
creeping across southern Europe and political crises beginning to spread even
to stalwart democracies like France, the Netherlands and the UK. The economic crisis in Europe meanwhile
continues unabated, Spain and the UK have officially entered a double-dip
recession, and the Euro zone is expected to shrink another .3 percent this
year.
In America, as a result of the lamented “bail-out”,
AKA old-fashioned Keynesian economics in thin disguise, the current GDP growth is
between 2 and 3 percent, still weak but definitely on the mend, and a number
Europe would love to have. Longer term,
the IMF has just projected that German GDP growth to 2017 will be only 40 percent
of the American growth rate. Germany,
you will recall, is the leading exponent of severe austerity. It has become clear to all in Europe, except
perhaps Germany, that austerity alone was part of the problem, not the
solution. It’s interesting that the
American politicians who most decry the “Europeanization” effect of liberal proposals
are the ones most inclined to follow
failed European solutions.
Other experiments are occurring further afield.
China, with an expected population over age 60 of 200 million by 2014, is
carefully extending its pension plans investments to include up to 40 percent
in the equities market. And China has
reduced its average cost to the consumer of medicine by 40 percent by
standardizing drug prices. They are also
exploring regulation of hospital administrative practices as a cost-cutting
device. The results are far from in, but
worth watching.
The point is, of course, that in this rapidly globalizing
world, we need no longer rely only on a longitudinal analysis of American
experience to understand our problems and their potential solutions. It’s time to lift our eyes to the world
around and to see both it and ourselves “as others see us.” We could avoid some costly blunders.
No comments:
Post a Comment