One of the interesting
aspects of the current wide-ranging discussions about Ukraine is that there
seems an American consensus about the topic and a shouting match in the
discussion of it. The consensus is that
Putin has gravely violated the sovereignty of Ukraine, that he must suffer
serious consequences for doing so, and that while military confrontation must
be avoided, economic and political sanctions of all kinds are appropriate. But you couldn't tell that from the
shouting. President Obama is talking
about the costs Putin must bear, while apoplectic senators like McCain are
screaming from the podium and senior statesmen like Kissinger and Albright are
urging calm. Talk show hosts are, as usual, frothing.
Years ago I sang in an
excellent A Capella chorus whose director kept impressing on us that one of the
most difficult things in choral music is to sing in unison, “with one voice.” We were very good at that, but it took hours
of practice. In American politics it’s
much harder and may never be achieved.
It’s part of the American culture.
The first CEO of General Motors was known to break up a meeting in
frustration because everyone agreed on an important topic. He treated consensus as a sign that not
enough thought had been given to the subject.
It’s part of our history: Massachusetts even threatened to secede over
the War of 1812.
What makes it unduly
hard these days is the perceived need of politicians of both parties for consistent
disagreement with others. It reminds me of the teenager stage when constant
disagreement with parents is an imperative.
But they grow out of that. Emerson
noted that ”a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”, and I
suppose the minds of some politicians are as little as any. Politicians in our history had no such need. Henry Clay was a notable hawk during the 1812
War but strongly opposed the Mexican War, as did Abraham Lincoln, who later led
us into the Civil War. And their
eloquence did not require shouting.
This of course is just
wishing on my part. As noted, cacophony is
part of the American makeup. Speaking
nonsense is one way we exercise our freedom of speech, and we could not endure
it if it were gone. But sometimes it is
important that others not part of our culture understand what we are saying,
and that is a responsibility that should be understood and accepted by all
public voices. What turned the opposing
voices of our past into an American harmony was realistic principle which
agreed or disagreed as necessary, without regard to positions taken by the
other political party. It’s been said
that part of the current crisis is that Putin does not really understand
America, and our political voices are not helping.
It used to be that in
an international crisis, domestic political voices quieted down and left the
talking to the President. Talking
stopped at the shore line. It’s not that
way anymore, but I can wish that some of our political voices old enough to
remember that era would think to bring it back.
No comments:
Post a Comment