Meanwhile Fareed
Zakaria reports, in an article he titles “The fading American dream,” that
social mobility in the U.S. is rapidly falling, both absolutely and in
international rankings. We are losing
our middle class and becoming the rich and the poor. Nowadays Canada and Australia, both similar
in many ways to America, have twice the economic mobility of America. One of the standard excuses for declining
mobility has been American heterogeneity and immigration, but Canada actually
has more foreign-born people than America.
A recent Harvard-Berkeley study points toward two major facts in the
decline. First is the increasing
economic segregation of American cities, which in turn leads to low
expenditures on public goods, their “social capital.” Zoning separates the rich from the poor, and
poor neighborhoods suffer from under-funded schools, high crime rates, family
breakdown, lack of civic support, and low community-service orientation. Meanwhile rich neighborhoods
prosper, their residents oblivious to the surrounding poverty. The separate-world “bubbles” grow before our
eyes and, like Disraeli’s 19th century England, we become “the rich
and the poor – two nations that do not know each other’s lives and do not
understand each other.” We still remain
far from a third-world country, but that is the direction toward which we are heading. For a nation that has only rich and poor
cannot compete in an increasingly high-tech global economy where already China
is producing many science and engineering experts for each one we produce and
the ability to understand and adapt to constant rapid change is a key to
success.
Zakaria notes that a
recent OECD report reveals that America is one of only three rich countries
that spend less on disadvantaged students than on other students. That is because, he notes, our nation-wide
school funding structure is based on the property tax. School districts with many poor have low
property values, leading to low school revenues and inadequate schools, while
wealthy districts have more than enough.
The “big bucks” we spend on education are mostly at the college level,
where they benefit students already advantaged.
Americans remain mostly oblivious to major needed educational needs, and
consequently are unwilling to fund or support them. A Washington Post article today reported that
two-thirds of Americans do not know about or understand the “common-core” educational
reforms already being implemented in 45 states.
55 percent say they oppose providing free public education for the
children of “illegal” immigrants. Both
of these measures are aimed at and would strongly enhance our social and
economic mobility.
I started out by
mentioning Wal-Mart and Kohl’s. Both are
examples, writ small, of what happens when you try to build a prosperous
economy while ignoring the poor. The
poor are your neighbors, your customers, your workers, and their children are
your fellow citizens of the future. As
they prosper, you prosper. And as they
struggle, you will also. I mentioned
some of the obvious policy areas where reforms would help – increasing the
minimum wage, worker re-unionization, residential zoning reform, property tax
reform, funding education for the disadvantaged, building the “social capital”
of cities. Other ways exist – re-enacting
Glass-Stegall, for example, to make investment for the future by the middle
class less a game of Russian Roulette – but it begins with breaking the bubble
and becoming aware of the lives around us.
For then we become aware that they and we prosper or fall together, and
their future is ours also.
No comments:
Post a Comment